Prehardened Mold Steels offer
Machinability and
Weldability By Stuart Caren, contributing
editor
For decades P-20 has been the most
widely used steel for making large plastic
injection molds. It offers a good combination
of hardness, machinability, and toughness,
but its properties are not always consistent.
Frequently, the hardness isn't uniform
thoughout a block, which leads to machining
problems, and it is difficult to
weld.
In the past few years, tool steels
that are easier to machine and weld have been
developed. One of these new materials is a
precipitation hardening steel of uniform
microstructure and hardness that was
developed by Prof. Asada and Dr. Watanabe of
Daido Industrial College in Nagoya, Japan.
This material was introduced to the plastics
industry in 1965 as NAK 80. Although NAK 80
is considerably harder than P-20 (40 Rockwell
C compared with 32 Rockwell C for P-20), it
reportedly machines 15-20% faster than P-20
and can be polished to a Class I
optic-quality finish.
To further improve machinability, a
small amount of sulfur was added to NAK 80 to
produce a new grade of steel called NAK 55.
Some NAK 55 users report as much as a 50%
reduction in machining time. According to
Dave Hunt, vice president of engineering at
Hunt Machine (Talmadge, OH), NAK 55 is "the
best machining prehardened steel I've ever
cut."
The success of NAK 80 and NAK 55 is
only partially attributable to their
excellent machinability. Usually, a mistake
in the mold or part design must be corrected
by welding. It is very difficult to weld,
polish, and retexture the surface of P-20
without the welded area being visible in the
steel and in the molded part. If the mistake
occurs in a highly polished or textured area,
the entire cavity may need to be scrapped.
The mold made from NAK, when proper
procedures and NAK-W welding rods are used,
will have uniform hardness across the weld.
This allows the toolmaker to purposefully
match the polish or etch.
Roland Krevitt, tooling engineer
from Apple Computer (Santa Clara, CA),
explains it this way: "In today's business
environment, it is crucial that we shorten
the time to market for new products as much
as is humanly possible. Because of this
constant pressure, we are usually forced to
build molds while the parts are being
designed. This means we make a lot of changes
to our molds, both during the construction
and after the try-out. If NAK was not
available, we would be in trouble. Our
ability to make these changes, sometimes in
an already textured area, has saved us
countless times. We have also found that NAK
etches much better than other mold
steels."
Then combination of machinability
and weldability is the main reason moldmakers
select NAK over P-20 in spite of it's higher
cost. According to Tom Schade, vice
president and general manager for
International Mold Steels (Erlanger, KY), the
U.S. distributor for Daido Steel Co. Ltd.,
NAK 55 and NAK 80 are used for over 90% of
all prehardened molds build in Japan and are
rapidly becoming the materials of choice for
moldmakers around the world. This is
confirmed by people like Dave Hunt of Hunt
Machine and Ed Noggle of Southern Plastic
Mold (Anaheim, CA).
Since they were introduced to the
United States in 1982, NAK steels have been
used for thousands of molds. Companies such
as Apple Computer and General Motor's Inland
Fisher Guide Division (Dayton, OH) often
specify NAK because of anticipated design
changes. Design changes to new parts
typically require modification of the
tool.
Design changes are also often made
during the life of the part. An example is a
horn pad that Hunt Machine built for General
Motors. After the mold was completed,
designers decided to relocate the bugles. "If
we cut it in P-20, we would have had to throw
away the mold and start again" said Paul
Bryan, a tooling engineer at General
Motors.
At Mold Expo '93 in Detroit, MI.
last month, International Mold Steels
introduced another prehardened steel for
injection molds. Called PK5, it combines the
weldability and machinability of NAK with
added toughness (Table 1).
Table 1. Properties of prehardened
mold steels
| Steel |
Tensile strength (kgf/mm
2) |
Yield strength (kgf/mm
2) |
Hardness* |
Toughness
†
(kgf-m/cm
2) |
| PX5 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
8 |
| NAK 80 |
128 |
103 |
40 |
2 |
| P-20 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
5 |
| AISI 4140 |
95 |
75 |
25 |
5 |
* Rockwell C †Charpy impact test
PX5 has the same hardness as P-20
(32 Rockwell C), but the hardness is more
consistent through the entire thickness. The
steel's tensile and yield strengths are
similar to NAK and P-20. Although a quench
and temper heat-treating process is used in
manufacturing PX5, the steel is quite stable.
It can be machined to size without the need
to relieve stress on the block before the
finish cut. Figure 1 compares the
machinability of PX5 with that of several
common mold steels.
|
The sacrifice in
hardness from NAK (40 Rockwell
C) is made up for by higher
toughness. PX5 is 60% tougher
than P-20. This improved
toughness allows increased
design creativity and
flexibility.
What really makes
PX5 unique is its
weldability. Welding this
steel requires neither
preheating nor postheating
(Figure 2), which greatly
reduces welding time and, of
course, cost.
According to Ernie
Beutel, vice president of
technical services for
International Mold Steels,
the increase in hardness in
the area heated during
welding is very low and
distortion is minimal,
resulting in low overall
repair time and cost. As with
NAK steels, the weld can be
textured or polished with no
observable difference in the
surface.
Since PX5 was
introduced in Japan about two
years ago, hundreds of molds
have been built with this new
steel. Hunt Machine learned
about it several months ago
and has already built a mold
for General Motors. According
to Dave Hunt, PX5 has lived
up to its claims, and he
confirms that it is easy to
machine and weld.
|
FIGURE 1. PX5 machines
about 30% faster than P-20 in
both end mill (top) and drill
(bottom) comparisons. |
As with any new material, at least
one drawback must offset the benefits. The
only one we heard about is the cost. PX5
costs about twice as much as P-20. But
because the steel cost is only 5-10% of the
total mold cost, the savings in machining
time and superior weldability more than make
up the difference.
Copyright © 1993 Advanstar Inc.
All rights reserved.
|